Smartphone Camera Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/mobile-reviews/ The leading source of independent audio, display, battery and image quality measurements and ratings for smartphone, camera, lens, wireless speaker and laptop since 2008. Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:55:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-o-transparent-150x150.png Smartphone Camera Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/mobile-reviews/ 32 32 Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/crosscall-stellar-x5-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/crosscall-stellar-x5-camera-test/#respond Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:17:21 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=168006&preview=true&preview_id=168006 We put the Crosscall Stellar-X5 through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our [...]

The post Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Crosscall Stellar-X5 through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50 MP, 80° (equivalent 26mm measured)
  • Ultra-wide:13 MP, 120° (equivalent 15mm measured)

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Crosscall Stellar-X5
113
camera
115
Photo
102

130

92

128

105

125

90

124

96

117

71

82

25
Bokeh
25

85

54
Preview
54

91

81
Zoom
49

120

88

122

124
Video
101

116

106

119

91

120

105

118

105

119

72

86

101

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Target exposure is generally accurate; extended dynamic range
  • Generally accurate white balance  and pleasant color rendering for outdoor and indoor images
  • Generally high texture levels in outdoor images
  • Stable and accurate photo autofocus in outdoor and indoor conditions

Cons

  • Occasional low image contrast in challenging backlit conditions
  • In photo, visible ghosting, hue shifts, and color quantization
  • In video, generally unstable autofocus
  • Image noise in low light
  • Low detail preservation when zooming in

The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range.

In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.

Crosscall has made great strides in image quality with the Stellar-X5 compared with the company’s previous offerings, but when compared with other devices in the same segment, the Stellar-X5 still has some way to go. For example, the HDR algorithm had quite a lot of artifacts such as contrast issues and ghosting. The device also performed some unwanted refocusing and had some instabilities, especially in video recording. However, video stabilization was quite good.

Even though Crosscall devices are targeted for outdoor photographers who usually take wide-angle images such as landscapes, we would have liked to have seen the Stellar-X5 come equipped with at least one dedicated tele module. But even without the tele camera, the Stellar-X5 produced good zoomed-in images that contained a fairly high level of details simply by cropping a photo taken with the main 50 MP wide module.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 – in this indoor example: fairly high level of texture on face, fairly extended dynamic range, slight hue shift visible (reflection on the wall) and visible ringing

 

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera Scores
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

115

Crosscall Stellar-X5

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Photo scores
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

102

Crosscall Stellar-X5

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 –  Accurate target exposure and extended dynamic range.
Honor 70 –  Accurate target exposure and extended dynamic range.

Color

92

Crosscall Stellar-X5

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 – Bright and Vivid colors, high level of details
Honor 70 – Bright and Vivid colors, lower level of texture

Autofocus

105

Crosscall Stellar-X5

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 100Lux Δ2EV TL84 Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 100Lux with TL84 illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 2, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 2. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

Texture

90

Crosscall Stellar-X5

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Crosscall Stellar-X5 – crop of the DMC at 100lux
Crosscall Action X5 – crop of the DMC at 100lux
Honor 70 – crop of the DMC at 100lux

Noise

96

Crosscall Stellar-X5

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

71

Crosscall Stellar-X5

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Zoom

81

Crosscall Stellar-X5

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Zoom Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

 

Crosscall Stellar-X5
Crosscall Stellar-X5 - fine details are lost
Honor 70
Honor 70 - fine details are lost
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 - fine details are lost

Video

124

Crosscall Stellar-X5

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Video scores
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

101

Crosscall Stellar-X5

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

106

Crosscall Stellar-X5

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 – accurate target exposure but some exposure blinking (on trees in the background), some autofocus pumping, limited dynamic range with hue shift (on forehead).

Texture

105

Crosscall Stellar-X5

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

105

Crosscall Stellar-X5

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

101

Crosscall Stellar-X5

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk-and-run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Crosscall Stellar-X5 – fairly efficient motion compensation in walk and run motion.

Artifacts

72

Crosscall Stellar-X5

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/crosscall-stellar-x5-camera-test/feed/ 0 CAMERA CAMERA Lightbulb_CrossCallStellarX5_DxOMark ChampsDeMarsStation_CrossCallStellarX5_DxOMark_P03_05-00 ChampsDeMarsStation_Honor70_DxOMark_05-00 FlowerLandscape_CrosscallStellarX5 FlowerLandscape_Honor70 Rulers_100Lux_SME_TL84_Tripod Rulers_100Lux_SME_TL84_Tripod Rulers_100Lux_SME_TL84_Tripod
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-ultra-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-ultra-camera-test/#respond Wed, 22 May 2024 11:00:06 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=171171&preview=true&preview_id=171171 We put the Xiaomi 14 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of [...]

The post Xiaomi 14 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Xiaomi 14 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1″ sensor, 24mm equivalent, f/1.6-4.0 automatic variable aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 50MP 1/2.51″ sensor, 12mm equivalent, f/1.8-aperture lens, PDAF
  • Tele1: 50MP 1/2.51″ sensor, 75mm equivalent (3.2x) lens
  • Tele2: 50MP 1/2.51″ sensor, 120mm equivalent (5x) lens

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Xiaomi 14 Ultra
149
camera
144
Photo
117

130

111

128

93

125

108

124

112

117

80

82

75
Bokeh
75

85

83
Preview
83

91

160
Zoom
120

Best

113

122

150
Video
113

116

118

119

114

120

113

118

118

119

75

86

115

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Good highlight retention, even in difficult backlit scenes
  • Almost noise-free images across all light conditions, including low light
  • Good detail when zooming
  • Accurate autofocus
  • Good exposure and fairly wide dynamic range
  • Accurate white balance and nice colors in most conditions
  • Effective stabilization in static video and when walking while recording

Cons

  • Often noticeable shutter lag
  • Limited depth of field results in some out-of-focus subjects in group portraits
  • Occasional color inaccuracies, especially in low light
  • Slightly soft textures across all test conditions
  • Local noise in some indoor and low light conditions
  • Occasionally slow focus transitions in video
  • Sharpness differences between video frames

The Xiaomi Ultra 14 delivered a good performance in the DXOMARK Camera tests, making it the best Xiaomi phone tested to date. However, it did not make it among the very best in our ranking. With a total of four 50MP image sensors, variable aperture, photo, and video HDR modes, as well as a host of other features and modes, the 14 Ultra offers some of the most impressive camera specs in the business. In terms of hardware, not much has changed from the 13 Ultra, though, meaning that most of the improvements over the predecessor are down to refined tuning and software optimization.

In our tests, overall photo quality was excellent, with a wide dynamic range, low noise and nice colors. However, the Xiaomi lagged behind the competition in some areas. It did not offer a zero shutter lag and the levels of captured detail were lower than on the best devices in our ranking. The 14 Ultra achieved the best results for tele zoom to date and was particularly impressive at close and medium range tele settings. However, at the opposite end of the zoom spectrum, ultra-wide results lagged behind other flagships in some test categories.

Video performance was excellent, thanks to good exposure and a wide dynamic range, nice colors and low noise. Video stabilization did a good job at keeping video footage smooth and stable. However, our testers also noticed local noise in some indoor and low light scenes, slow focus transitions and sharpness differences between video frames.

Please note that the Xiaomi 14 Ultra sample photos and videos were captured and analyzed in HDR mode, as the Xiaomi HDR mode is compatible with Google’s. The Huawei and Apple examples used in this article were captured and analyzed in their respective HDR formats, but their images might not be displayed as HDR on other devices and web browsers due to the makers’ proprietary HDR formats.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Vivid colors in Leica Vibrant mode

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Camera Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

144

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra delivered very good results with its primary camera. Noise levels were very low across all light conditions, and a wide dynamic range ensured good highlight and shadow detail. Colors were nice, with accurate white balance and the autofocus system delivered good sharpness on subjects. However, unlike most direct rivals, the 14 Ultra did not offer a zero shutter lag, and the level of captured detail was lower than on the best-in-class devices. Our testers also observed some color casts in low light, contrast issues, and HDR artifacts.

Like on previous Xiaomi models, the 14 Ultra lets users choose between the Leica Vibrant and Leica Authentic modes in the camera app. For the purpose of this test, Vibrant mode was used, but results would be very similar with Authentic mode. Which mode you prefer is pretty much a matter of personal taste. It’s also worth mentioning that the 14 Ultra offers a Pro mode, allowing for manual selection of various exposure parameters. Pro mode was not tested, but the user interface looks intuitive and appears to be a good option for more seasoned photographers.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

117

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

In our tests, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra auto exposure worked well, with good subject exposure in most conditions. A wide dynamic range ensured good detail in the highlight and shadow portions of the frame, but our testers also observed some contrast issues.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Accurate face exposure, wide dynamic range, low face contrast
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Accurate face exposure, wide dynamic range
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate face exposure, wide dynamic range, low face contrast

In very low light, the Xiaomi produced slightly darker exposures than some competitors. This resulted in more pronounced clipping in the shadow portions of the frame.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Shadow clipping
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Less shadow clipping
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Less shadow clipping

Color

111

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

In Leica Vibrant mode, colors were bright and – as one would expect – vibrant. This worked especially well for landscapes with green tones and blue skies but could be less successful for skin-tone rendering.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Orange skin tones
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – More natural and pleasant skin tones
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – More natural and pleasant skin tones

White balance was generally neutral, but in warm low light, color casts could be observed. These casts could be stronger, with a different hue, than in the actual scene. In this kind of light condition, many competitors tended to produce a more natural white balance.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Pinkish cast
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Yellow cast
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Orange cast

Autofocus

93

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

While the Xiaomi’s direct competitors all come with zero shutter lag, the 14 Ultra, like its predecessor, does not offer this feature in most test conditions. As a result, in our tests the image could be captured with a slight delay after pressing the shutter, increasing the risk of missing the decisive moment in moving scenes. In contrast, both Huawei’s and Apple’s current models take very little time to capture. This can be seen in the graph above, as well as in the sample shots below where the shutter is pressed as the model passes under the beam.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Shutter lag, model has moved forward
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Zero shutter lag
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Zero shutter lag

Like the latest Huawei ultra-premium devices, the Mate 60 Pro+ and Pura 70 Ultra, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra comes with a variable aperture. Like the Huawei variant, the Xiaomi system automatically adjusts to the light conditions, using a wider aperture in low light. However, it does not appear to adjust to scene content. Therefore, in group portraits, faces in the background could be out of focus in our tests.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Group portrait
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Shallow depth of field, background face out of focus
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Group portrait
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Wide depth of field, background face in focus

Texture

108

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra captured pretty decent detail that is good enough when viewing images on the device display or for typical social media use. However, under closer inspection, it is noticeable that the competition delivers higher levels of detail and better textures, especially when shooting indoors or in low light.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Indoor detail
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Soft detail
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Indoor detail
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Finer detail
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Indoor detail
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Finer detail

Noise

112

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

80

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Our experts noticed several HDR-related artifacts, including halo effects, image fusion issues, and ghosting.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Portrait with motion
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Ghosting

Bokeh

75

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

85

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra camera app offers two different modes for bokeh simulation. For this test, we have used and scored the master portrait mode, but both modes delivered similar results in our protocol.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Master Portrait mode
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Depth estimation errors on spikes and on background
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Aperture mode
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Excellent depth estimation

The Xiaomi’s master portrait mode worked well in our tests, with strong background blur and very good subject detail. However, it lagged slightly behind the competition in terms of subject isolation, with more segmentation artifacts and an overall less natural bokeh effect. Our testers also noticed a significantly reduced dynamic range in this mode, with frequent highlight and shadow clipping. In addition, color rendering was less vibrant, especially on faces.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Limited dynamic range, low color saturation and skin tones in master portrait mode
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Pleasant color rendering, extended dynamic range in portrait mode

Preview

83

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s preview image on the display was often significantly different from the actual capture, making it difficult for the photographer to predict the final result.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Capture
Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Preview – Difference in terms of bokeh effect and more limited dynamic range than capture

Zoom

160

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

In our tests, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra did very well in the zoom category. Thanks to the powerful tele hardware (two dedicated tele cameras) and its performance, the device achieved the highest score to date in tele. Image results at close and medium tele range were particularly impressive. The ultra-wide camera captured good image quality as well, but lagged behind the best in class for some test attributes.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Wide

113

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra ultra-wide camera delivered an overall good performance but could not quite keep up with the best, such as the Honor Magic6 Pro or Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, especially in terms of detail from 16mm to 21mm equivalent focal length. Image noise was well under control but a lack of detail was noticeable.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Ultra-wide (18mm)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Slight loss of detail on face
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Ultra-wide (18mm)
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Good subject detail
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Ultra-wide (18mm)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Good subject detail, some noise

Tele

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

Best

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra offers mobile photographers multiple options in the zoom category, but its strongest performance was in tele. The device provided an excellent tele zooming experience, with images that contained very little noise but a high level of details, especially at close and medium range.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Close range tele (50mm)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Good detail, excellent focus on face
Apple iPhone 15 Ultra - Close range tele (50mm)
Apple iPhone 15 Ultra - Lack of detail, slightly out of focus

Even at challenging long-range tele settings such as 170mm equivalent, the 14 Ultra produced crisp images containing an impressive amount of detail, while keeping noise very well under control.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Long range tele (170mm)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Limited noise, fairly good detail
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Long range tele (170mm)
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Limited noise, loss of detail, ringing
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Long range tele (170mm)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Slight noise, fairly good detail

The tele module also provided outstanding macro results for a smartphone thanks to its capability to focus on a subject at an extremely close range. While the macro did not achieve the 1:1 magnification of some competitors, small subjects were captured, filling the frame with lots of detail and lower noise levels than the competition.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – 120mm close focus – Excellent detail, almost noise-free
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – 120mm close focus –  Significant loss of detail
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – 120mm close focus – Significant loss of detail, noise

Video

150

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our tests, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra delivered an excellent video performance, with good exposure and a wide dynamic range, nice colors, low noise as well as effective stabilization. On the downside, our testers observed local noise in some indoor and low-light scenes, occasionally slow focus transitions, and sharpness differences between video frames.

The camera supports recording in 8K resolution at 30fps and 4K at 60fps, across all rear cameras. In addition, the 14 Ultra offers a specialized movie mode with adjustable frame rates and various cinematic options, expanding the creative flexibility of videographers. We tested the Xiaomi’s master cinema mode, which uses an HLG (Hybrid Log-Gamma)-based HDR format. Dolby Vision is also available in the settings, offering a different, brighter rendering. Overall performance is similar for both modes.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

113

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

The Xiaomi 14 Ultra delivered very good results for video exposure. Subject exposure was good and a wide dynamic range ensured good highlight and shadow detail, even when recording in low light or in scenes with backlighting. However,  our testers occasionally noticed some slight exposure transition issues and instabilities under indoor conditions and in low light.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Accurate target exposure, wide dynamic range but slight exposure transition issues

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate target exposure, wide dynamic range and smooth exposure transition

Color

118

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Video color was excellent when recording in bright daylight and under indoor conditions. A slight, but still acceptable, color cast could be noticeable in low light. Skin tones were nice and accurate in most test scenes.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Neutral white balance, accurate skin tone rendering

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate white balance and skin tone rendering

Autofocus

114

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Video focus worked reliably, with the focus locked on target at all times and no errors. Focus transitions were smooth and pleasant but sometimes could be too slow.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Low noise, fairly good texture

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Fine luminance noise, good texture

Texture

113

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

The level of captured texture was excellent under daylight conditions, but when recording in dimmer conditions detail became slightly soft, and our testers noticed a lack of fine detail.

Noise

118

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Video noise levels were low across all test conditions, making for pleasant footage, even in low-light recordings. On some occasions, our testers noticed  slight local shadow noise when shooting in low light.

Stabilization

115

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

The Xiaomi’s video stabilization system was very effective at counteracting camera motion when holding the camera still and when walking while recording. Still, our testers noticed a slight frameshift effect during panning and sharpness differences between frames across all test conditions.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra – Slight camera shake, sharpness differences between frames

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slight camera shake

Artifacts

75

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

In terms of video artifacts, our testers found moiré patterns on fine detail. A judder effect could occur when panning the camera, and flare could make an appearance when recording backlit scenes.

The post Xiaomi 14 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-ultra-camera-test/feed/ 0 Best CAMERA CAMERA 028_Main_Xiaomi14Ultra BacklitGroup_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 BacklitGroup_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 BacklitGroup_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 FlashOffWellWest_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 FlashOffWellWest_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 FlashOffWellWest_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 FaceToFace_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 FaceToFace_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 FaceToFace_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_06-00 CandleDinner_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 CandleDinner_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 CandleDinner_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 CatWalk_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 CatWalk_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 CatWalk_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00-bis CafetShrub_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 CafetShrub_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 HelloStill_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 HelloStillPreview_Xiaomi14Ultra_DxOMark_01-00 Best 029_Zoom-x5_Xiaomi14Ultra 029_Zoom-x5_Pura_70_ultra 029_Zoom-x5_AppleiPhone15ProMax
Google Pixel 8a Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-8a-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-8a-camera-test/#respond Wed, 15 May 2024 11:58:54 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=168631&preview=true&preview_id=168631 We put the Google Pixel 8a  through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of [...]

The post Google Pixel 8a Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Google Pixel 8a  through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 64MP f/1.89, 1/1.73″ sensor, 0.8µm pixels, 26mm equivalent lens, Quad PDAF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 13MP sensor, 1.12µm pixels, 120˚ field of view, f/2.2-aperture lens

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
136
camera
141
Photo
116

130

117

128

104

125

107

124

93

117

80

82

60
Bokeh
60

85

71
Preview
71

91

126
Zoom
90

120

112

122

128
Video
106

116

108

119

100

120

93

118

86

119

79

86

114

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Accurate target exposure
  • Fairly good contrast and good detail in photo
  • Pleasant colors with fairly neutral white balance in video
  • Effective video stabilization, accurate and stable autofocus

Cons

  • Sometimes inaccurate skin tones in indoor portraits
  • Unstable autofocus and noise variation across consecutive shots
  • Depth estimation artifacts in bokeh mode shots
  • Low texture/noise trade-off in video portraits, occasional exposure adaptation issues
  • Frequent autofocus stepping, frame shift and sharpness differences between frames, some color fringing and judder

The Google Pixel 8a performed very well for its class in the DXOMARK Camera evaluations and showed improvements over its predecessor Pixel 7a. The Pixel 8a uses the same Google Tensor G3 chipset as the other Pixel 8 series devices but lacks a dedicated tele camera and comes with generally less advanced hardware when compared to the flagship Pixel 8 Pro.

Overall, image results were close to the Pixel 8, particularly for photo and zoom. However, the Pixel 8a did not quite match the Pixel 8 and 8 Pro, and even the predecessor 7a, in terms of video detail. Our testers were particularly impressed by the Pixel 8a’s color rendering and skin tones in still photography. While the ultra-wide camera captured excellent image results, the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens meant that telephoto image quality was not quite on par with the best in class. In video mode, the Pixel 8a generally performed well under most conditions, but our testers noticed some weaknesses in terms of color and detail when recording portrait scenes.

Despite some minor shortcomings, the Google Pixel 8a is a good option for those seeking exceptional camera performance in the high-end segment.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Google Pixel 8a Camera Scores
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

141

Google Pixel 8a

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our photo tests, the Google Pixel 8a’s performance was impressive and among the best in its class. Our experts particularly liked the camera’s accurate color rendering and skin tones, especially when shooting in bright light. Exposure was good across a range of light conditions, and the wide dynamic range helped preserve detail in both the highlight and shadow portions of the frame, similar to what we had previously seen on the Pixel 8. The autofocus was quick to react and worked accurately. We noticed a slightly shallower depth of field than on the Pixel 8.

The level of captured detail was high in bright light but could not quite match the Google flagships Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro. In addition, the Pixel 8a’s noise levels were slightly higher across all test conditions.

Google Pixel 8a – Good exposure and warm colors, wide dynamic range.
Google Pixel 8a Photo scores
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

116

Google Pixel 8a

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color

117

Google Pixel 8a

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good pictures. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin-tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors, but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Google Pixel 8a – Accurate target exposure, wide dynamic range, nice colors, neutral white balance
Google Pixel 8 – Accurate target exposure, wide dynamic range, nice colors, neutral white balance
Apple iPhone 15 – Accurate target exposure, wide dynamic range, nice colors, warm white balance

Autofocus

104

Google Pixel 8a

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 1000Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

Texture

107

Google Pixel 8a

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

93

Google Pixel 8a

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

80

Google Pixel 8a

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Preview

71

Google Pixel 8a

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Google Pixel 8a – Accurate preview with HDR rendering
Google Pixel 8a – Capture: similar to preview but slightly better

Zoom

126

Google Pixel 8a

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

In terms of zooming, the Google Pixel 8a delivered somewhat mixed results. The ultra-wide camera produced good image quality that was close to the Pixel 8, but the lack of a dedicated tele camera module meant that tele image quality at medium and long range lagged behind some other devices in its class.

Google Pixel 8a Zoom Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Wide

112

Google Pixel 8a

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

Google Pixel 8a – Good exposure, nice colors, quite good detail
Google Pixel 8 – Good exposure, nice colors, quite good detail
Apple iPhone 15 – Good exposure, greener white balance, slightly lower levels of detail

Tele

90

Google Pixel 8a

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

Video

128

Google Pixel 8a

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In video mode, the Google Pixel 8a was tested at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second. With these settings, the camera performed generally well in most conditions but revealed some weaknesses in exposure adaptation and detail rendering. In our tests, the camera also had a tendency to clip highlights. The level of recorded detail was fairly low, and our testers also noticed some slight autofocus stepping. On the plus side, colors were usually pleasant, with a neutral white balance. Video stabilization was effective and target exposure was accurate.

Google Pixel 8a Video scores
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

106

Google Pixel 8a

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

108

Google Pixel 8a

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Google Pixel 8a – Accurate target exposure, nice colors

Google Pixel 8 – Accurate target exposure, nice colors

Oppo Find X6 – Google Pixel 8a – Slight underexposure, nice colors

Texture

93

Google Pixel 8a

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

86

Google Pixel 8a

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

114

Google Pixel 8a

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Google Pixel 8a – Quite effective stabilization but sharpness differences between frames

Google Pixel 8 – Quite effective stabilization but sharpness differences between frames

Oppo Find X6 – Quite effective stabilization

Artifacts

79

Google Pixel 8a

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Google Pixel 8a Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-8a-camera-test/feed/ 0 Google Pixel 8a CAMERA CAMERA GooglePixel8a_DxOMark ChampsDeMarsStation_GooglePixel8A-00 ChampsDeMarsStation_GooglePixel8_05-00 ChampsDeMarsStation_AppleiPhone15_DxOMark_05-00 LianaPreview_GooglePixel8A_DxOMark_01-00 Liana_GooglePixel8A_DxOMark_05-00 16mm_ColorPlayGround_GooglePixel8A_DxOMark_05-00 16mm_ColorPlayGround_GooglePixel8_DxOMark_05-00 16mm_ColorPlayGround_AppleiPhone15_DxOMark_05-00
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/huawei-pura-70-ultra-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/huawei-pura-70-ultra-camera-test/#respond Tue, 07 May 2024 14:37:23 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=171800&preview=true&preview_id=171800 We put the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results [...]

The post Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1″ sensor, f/1.6-4.0-aperture lens, DualPD AF, Sensor-shift OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 40MP, f/2.2-aperture lens, QuadPD AF
  • Tele: 50MP, f/2.1-aperture lens, QuadPD AF, OIS

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
163
camera
169
Photo
130

Best

128

Best

125

Best

120

124

117

Best

81

82

85
Bokeh
85

Best

82
Preview
82

91

164
Zoom
119

120

122

Best

148
Video
115

116

115

119

120

Best

111

118

110

119

75

86

115

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

Top score Best

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

Top score Best

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

Top score Best

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

Top score Best

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Nicely balanced exposure and contrast across all light conditions; outstanding rendering when viewed on HDR display
  • Very nice colors when viewed on HDR display
  • Fast and accurate autofocus, good video stabilization
  • Variable aperture allows for optimized depth of field in each scene
  • Very good texture/noise trade-off across most conditions and in all zoom settings
  • Natural blur in bokeh mode, smooth gradient, and accurate  subject isolation
  • 3.5x tele macro shots at f/2.1 offer nice perspective and good sharpness

Cons

  • Local noise in video
  • Ghosting in shots with moving subjects, even in bright light
  • Occasional color quantization, especially in low light
  • Occasional unnatural textures in low light and night shots
  • Some unnatural rendering in tele zoom shots

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra delivered outstanding performances across all areas in the DXOMARK Camera tests, securing itself the top position in our ranking. Still image results were exceptional across all camera modules, resulting in top scores not only for photo but also for zoom wide and tele. The camera’s ability to balance detail retention and noise reduction was impressive, and images showed precise exposure and a wide dynamic range, as well as pleasant colors. Thanks to its large main camera sensor and careful tuning, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra showed strong improvements in texture and noise compared to its predecessors. Good detail and exposure were maintained, even when shooting in low light. The device showed a particular ability to deliver images with natural skin-tone rendering and an accurate white balance even in very complex lighting conditions such as low light. The variable aperture helped provide optimal depth-of-field and good sharpness on all subjects in group shots. The autofocus was fast and reliable in static and dynamic scenes alike. The fast shutter time and response allowed for freezing motion and capturing the decisive moment.

Unlike Huawei’s previous flagship, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra was tested in HDR photo mode. The wider dynamic range in this mode resulted in noticeably better contrast and color rendering. However, the Pura 70 Ultra uses a proprietary Huawei HDR format that can only be viewed on some of the latest Huawei phones and tablets. It is not widely compatible with other Android devices or even some of Huawei’s models, including laptops. We converted the images into the AVIF image file format to allow visualization outside the Huawei ecosystem for perceptual evaluation. Images included in these test results are original JPEG files from the device. Find out more about HDR imaging from capture to display in this article.

Video was tested on the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra in 4K/30fps mode using the HDR Vivid format. Although the Pura 70 Ultra progressed in certain aspects of video performance over the Mate 60 Pro+, the Pura 70 Ultra could not quite match the current best video devices, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Oppo Find X7 Ultra,  when it came to the most challenging low-light test scenes.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Wide dynamic range, good exposure, vibrant colors, high level of detail.
Top score Best
Friends & Family

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a great option for capturing pictures and videos of friends and family, achieving the best friends and family score to date. The camera kept motion blur in moving scenes to a minimum, allowed for precise capture of the decisive moment, and produced images with  fairly accurate skin tones. In terms of photo capture, the only real downside was an occasional ghosting effect in moving scenes, especially with backlighting. Performance in this category was lower in video mode, where our testers observed occasional underexposure on faces in low light.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Wide depth of field in group shots, good detail, nice skin tones, well-balanced exposure and contrast.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Depth of field is slightly too shallow in group shots, nice skin tones, well-balanced exposure.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Wide depth of field in group shots, good detail, nice skin tones, well-balanced exposure.
Top score Best
Lowlight

The Pura 70 Ultra was also the best device tested to date for low-light capture. In dim conditions, the camera offered a wide dynamic range, capturing good detail in both the highlight and shadow areas of the frame. Image noise was generally well under control, and images showed high levels of detail. However,  unnatural texture rendering could be noticeable in some night scenes.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Wide dynamic range, nice colors, high levels of detail, very slight noise, accurate focus and wide depth of field.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate exposure but slightly visible clipping and color quantization, very slight noise, slightly inaccurate focus and shallow depth of field.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Accurate exposure, slightly visible color quantization, very slight noise, slightly inaccurate focus and shallow depth of field.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Camera Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In photo mode, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra delivered the best performance of all devices tested to date. The combination of the large 1” image sensor and the f/1.6 – 4.0 variable aperture allowed for depth of field adjustments and creative flexibility that is pretty much unheard of in the smartphone world. In our tests, photos offered nice colors and good contrast when viewed on an HDR display. Dynamic range was wide, and good face exposure made for pleasant portrait shots. White balance was accurate, and the atmosphere of the ambient light was captured nicely. The autofocus was fast and accurate, and the camera managed a good trade-off between noise reduction and texture preservation.

Minor issues included some slight exposure and white balance instabilities, as well as an occasional ghosting effect, especially when shooting high-contrast scenes. Our testers also noticed slight noise in very low-light shots.

In addition, the Huawei did well when taking close-up and macro shots, thanks to the fairly wide aperture and close focus distance of the tele camera, which was used in macro mode. White balance could sometimes be slightly unstable in macro images, but other than that the pictures were detailed and pleasant, with a nice perspective compression.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.
Close-Up

In our tests, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra captured very nice macro shots. The use of the 3.5x tele lens allowed for a longer shooting distance than most rivals and provided a nicely compressed perspective. Overall, macro and close-up shots were pleasant and showed good detail. Only occasionally did our testers notice a slightly unstable white balance.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Excellent subject isolation, thanks to the macro tele module, accurate focus.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Less pronounced subject isolation.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Good subject isolation, slightly inaccurate focus.

Exposure

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

The camera managed accurate target exposure with a very wide dynamic range across all light conditions. In combination with the very good HDR format rendering, this resulted in some of the best balanced images we have seen on a smartphone. Contrast was very pleasant as well, even when shooting difficult scenes.

This said, our testers noticed some slight exposure instabilities in challenging conditions, for example, some backlit scenes. In such conditions, results could be inconsistent across a series of consecutive shots.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Accurate target exposure, outstanding contrast on HDR display.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate target exposure, very good contrast on HDR display.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Accurate target exposure, good contrast on HDR display.

Color

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Color was rendered nicely, with generally accurate white balance and only occasional color casts, resulting in the device reaching the top score in color. Skin-tone rendering was good across all types of skin tones and light conditions. The HDR format also helped improve color rendering, with nice color contrast in all scenes, but especially backlit portrait shots. On the downside, our testers observed some slight white balance instabilities in all light conditions.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Accurate white balance and color rendering, pleasant skin tone.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slightly cold color cast, accurate color rendering, pleasant skin tone.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Accurate white balance and color rendering, pleasant skin tone.

Autofocus

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

In our tests, the Pura 70 Ultra autofocus was fast and accurate, allowing for sharp images and capture at the decisive moment. The variable aperture system in combination with the large image sensor meant that the Huawei was capable of optimizing depth of field for each scene. For example, in group portraits, the Huawei produced a wider depth of field than competing devices, providing good sharpness across all subject distances. The camera was capable of picking the best aperture for all our portrait test scenes, from single subjects to larger groups.

Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 5Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 5Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 2000ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Wide depth of field allows sharp background subject.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Shallow depth of field makes background subject blurry.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Wide depth of field allows sharp background subject.

Texture

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

In our tests, the Pura 70 Ultra captured high levels of detail and images with natural texture rendering. The excellent real-life results were confirmed by objective measurements in the lab. Texture was very fine and accurate, providing natural detail rendering on a wide range of scenes, from skin texture in portraits to distant vegetation in landscape shots. In addition, the level of captured detail remained high in low and very low light conditions. This said, our testers observed a local loss of detail in some scenes, especially in low light.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Excellent level of details
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Good level of details
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Good level of details

Noise

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

In our tests, the Pura 70 Ultra kept image noise very well under control across all test conditions. Luminance noise was managed well, but chroma noise and color quantization could sometimes be noticeable, especially when shooting in low light.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Very well-controlled noise even in very low light.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Slight noise in very low light.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Very well controlled noise in very low light.

Artifacts

81

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

In some instances,  image artifacts such as fusion were occasionally observed, especially in strong contrast conditions.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Fusion artifact

 

 

Main photo artifacts penalties

Bokeh

85

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

When shooting in bokeh mode, the Pura 70 Ultra captured images with a generally natural blur effect, smooth blur gradient and accurate subject isolation.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Natural blur effect, smooth blur gradient, very accurate subject isolation.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Natural blur effect, smooth blur gradient, accurate subject isolation.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Natural blur effect, smooth blur gradient, accurate subject isolation.

Preview

82

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Our specialists observed a noticeable improvement in the preview quality of the Pura 70 Ultra compared to the Mate 60 Pro+, but it was still not on the same level as the class-leading iPhone 15 Pro Max. The Pura 70 Ultra’s preview was quite similar to the capture in terms of target exposure, dynamic range, and color rendering. However, during testing, our evaluators detected some slight differences between the preview and final images, particularly in bokeh mode, where depth estimation sometimes differed, resulting in less accurate bokeh simulation on the preview. Nevertheless, the dynamic range in the preview remained fairly accurate across various conditions, closely resembling the captured image.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Preview
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Capture

Zoom

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra produced exceptional results not only with its primary module but also with its telephoto and ultra-wide cameras, achieving the best results in the tele and wide categories to date. Images showed good detail, and the effective noise reduction did not compromise fine textures. The autofocus system performed reliably, and zoom images had a wide dynamic range, nice skin tones, and accurate white balance.

However, our testers also observed minor color instabilities and slight ringing or aliasing on high-contrast edges. This said, overall zoom images were consistently pleasing across the zoom range, and texture measurements were quite high. The Pura 70 Ultra’s performance was excellent at medium and long-range tele zoom settings, matching the very best in class. At close and extra long tele settings, the Huawei delivered the best results we have seen to date, with beautiful texture rendering, especially in portraits, and minimal noise, even when shooting in low light.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.
Video Zoom

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra provided a very good level of detail in video zoom, even though occasionally, some camera jumps as well as exposure and color variations were visible while zooming. The Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max still offers a smoother user experience for video zoom.

Wide

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

The performance in wide was the best we have tested so far at DXOMARK, with an excellent level of detail and very well-managed noise levels in the whole field of the 13mm ultra-wide module. Dynamic range was wide, and exposure and white balance were accurate. The color rendering was pleasant in most conditions.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Wide dynamic range, pleasant colors, excellent level of details.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Wide dynamic range, slight white balance cast, excellent level of details.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Wide dynamic range, very slight white balance cast, excellent level of details.

Tele

119

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

Similar to the wide camera performance, the Pura 70 Ultra’s tele performance was at the top of our database, with an excellent level of detail, low level of noise, and pleasant color rendering across the entire zoom range. Perceptual results and measurements were similar to the Mate 60 Pro+ except in very long range (>150mm), which still showed good improvements.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - 3.5x - Accurate exposure, pleasant skin tone, excellent level of detail.
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - 3.5x - Accurate exposure, pleasant skin tone, slight loss of detail.
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - 3.5x - Accurate exposure, pleasant skin tone, very good level of detail.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

Video

148

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our video tests, the Pura 70 Ultra’s autofocus performance was excellent, with quick reactions and smooth transitions. Exposure and colors were accurate in most conditions, but our experts noticed some slight instabilities in low light. Color rendering in bright light was improved over the Mate 60 Pro+, with higher levels of saturation. However, colors still could not quite match the vibrance of the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Levels of captured detail were high, and noise was well under control in bright light and when shooting indoors. However, some noise could be noticeable in low light, especially on moving elements in the scene. Chroma noise could be visible in the shadows. Video stabilization was effective, with very few sharpness differences between video frames across all light conditions. Camera shake was only slightly noticeable in the recorded footage.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

115

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

In video mode, target exposure was generally accurate and dynamic range was fairly wide, providing good highlight preservation in high-contrast scenes across all light levels.

Color

115

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

White balance was accurate in most test conditions, but some slight adaptation issues could sometimes be noticeable in very challenging scenes.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Accurate skin tones, slightly visible color adaptations.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate skin tones, slightly visible color adaptations.

Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Accurate skin tones, slightly visible color adaptations.

Autofocus

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Best

The autofocus performed particularly well in video mode, with smooth and accurate focusing, even in difficult scenes.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Fast and smooth autofocus.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Fast and smooth autofocus.

Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Fast and smooth autofocus.

Texture

111

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

Video texture measurements in the lab were high across all test conditions. This was confirmed by our results in real-life recording, with good texture across all types of subjects, including faces. However, our testers noticed some moving texture artifacts, especially when shooting video in low light.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

110

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Video noise was generally well under control in static scenes, including our lab tests. Some noise could be noticeable in low light, especially on moving elements in the scene. Chroma noise could be visible in the shadow portions of the frame.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

115

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Video stabilization did a very good job at compensating for camera motion, but it could not quite match the best-in-class devices. Artifacts, such as the jello effect or sharpness differences between frames were well under control.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Excellent stabilization

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Excellent stabilization

Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Excellent stabilization

Artifacts

75

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

In our video tests, we noticed some unwanted artifacts, including scene integrity artifacts, judder, and aliasing. Unlike the class leader in video, the iPhone 15 Pro Max, the Pura 70 Ultra does not offer a fast 60fps frame rate in bright daylight conditions and when recording indoors.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/huawei-pura-70-ultra-camera-test/feed/ 0 Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Best Best Best Best Best Best Best Best Best Best Best CAMERA CAMERA Amadeus_HuaweiPura70Ultra Best PeopleTrioMultiPlan_HuaweiPura70Ultra PeopleTrioMultiPlan_AppleiPhone15ProMax PeopleTrioMultiPlan_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark_05-00 Best IMG_20240502_231107_HuaweiPura70Ultra IMG_8737_AppleiPhone15ProMax IMG_20240502_231457_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Best IMG_20240502_151415_HuaweiPura70Ultra IMG20240502151541_OppoFindX7Ultra IMG_20240502_151614_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Best IMG_20240503_163455_Pura70Ultra IMG_8902_AppleiPhone15ProMax IMG_20240503_163803_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Best IMG_20240503_170117_HuaweiPura70Ultra IMG_8916_AppleiPhone15ProMax IMG_20240503_170428_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Best Best Best IMG_20240503_170912_HuaweiPura70Ultra IMG_E8922_AppleiPhone15ProMax IMG_20240503_171156_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Screenshot_20240503_170125_HuaweiPura70Ultra IMG_20240503_170117_HuaweiPura70Ultra Best Best 12mm_Cityscape_HuaweiPura70Ultra 12mm_Cityscape_AppleiPhone15ProMax 12mm_Cityscape_HuaweiMate60ProPlus_DxOMark Best
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos) Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test-2/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test-2/#respond Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:47:38 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=169667&preview=true&preview_id=169667 The Samsung Galaxy S24+ and Samsung Galaxy S24 share the same rear camera specs as well as the same chipset, so as expected, the results of the Samsung Galaxy S24+ camera were exactly the same as those of the Samsung Galaxy S24. For a more in-depth look at the Samsung Galaxy S24+ rear camera photo [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos) Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ and Samsung Galaxy S24 share the same rear camera specs as well as the same chipset, so as expected, the results of the Samsung Galaxy S24+ camera were exactly the same as those of the Samsung Galaxy S24.

For a more in-depth look at the Samsung Galaxy S24+ rear camera photo and video performance, we direct you to the full test results of the Samsung Galaxy S24 camera.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 24mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP 1/2.55″ sensor, 1.4µm pixels, 13mm equivalent f/2.2-aperture lens, Super Steady video
  • Tele: 10MP 1/3.94″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 67mm equivalent f/2.4-aperture lens, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S24+
133
camera
134
Photo
114

130

106

128

108

125

104

124

81

117

73

82

65
Bokeh
65

85

69
Preview
69

91

135
Zoom
99

120

102

122

125
Video
96

116

99

119

100

120

104

118

91

119

78

86

112

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Accurate photo exposure and contrast in most conditions
  • Pleasant photo colors in bright light and indoors
  • Accurate photo autofocus in most conditions in photo
  • Artifacts fairly well under control

Cons

  • Photo and video noise in most conditions
  • Color inaccuracies and color shading in low light
  • Artifacts such as hue shift, fusion artifacts and flare
  • Some focus failures in video

 

 

The post Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos) Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test-2/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus CAMERA CAMERA
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test/#respond Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:34:06 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167946&preview=true&preview_id=167946 We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 24mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP 1/2.55″ sensor, 1.4µm pixels, 13mm equivalent f/2.2-aperture lens, Super Steady video
  • Tele: 10MP 1/3.94″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 67mm equivalent f/2.4-aperture lens, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
133
camera
134
Photo
114

130

106

128

108

125

104

124

81

117

73

82

65
Bokeh
65

85

69
Preview
69

91

135
Zoom
99

120

102

122

125
Video
96

116

99

119

100

120

104

118

91

119

78

86

112

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Accurate photo exposure and contrast in most conditions
  • Pleasant photo colors in bright light and indoors
  • Accurate photo autofocus in most conditions in photo
  • Artifacts fairly well under control

Cons

  • Photo and video noise in most conditions
  • Color inaccuracies and color shading in low light
  • Artifacts such as hue shift, fusion artifacts and flare
  • Some focus failures in video

The Samsung Galaxy S24 performed well for a range of attributes in the DXOMARK Camera evaluation. Overall, our testers observed some nice improvements over the previous S-series generation in photo mode, but video mode showed some room for improvement. Photo exposure was well-balanced across all test conditions, Samsung’s HDR technology offered pleasant and faithful contrast in bright light and indoors, and the autofocus system ensured sharp subjects in most scenes. However, some limitations were noticeable. The camera had difficulties capturing the precise moment in fast-moving scenes with a high dynamic range or in low light. Images also showed significant noise levels that were higher than on the S24 Ultra and even the predecessor S23.

The S24 offers a tele camera module with an equivalent focal length of 67mm, in addition to an ultra-wide camera. Even with this fairly simple setup, the device managed ultra-wide and tele zoom images with good exposure and pleasant colors.

In video mode, the S24 recorded clips with accurate exposure and color in most conditions, but our testers found exposure and white balance to be less stable than on the S23, similar to what we had observed in our test of the S24 Ultra. In addition, in video mode, the camera consistently produced autofocus errors, which we had not seen on the S24 Ultra or the S23. Texture was comparable to the S24 Ultra, but video noise levels were noticeably higher, especially when recording in low light.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Camera Scores
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

134

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The Samsung S24 delivered a solid performance, that was relatively close to the S24 Ultra, in our photo tests. The autofocus system did a good job, and images showed nice contrast and pleasant colors. However, the level of image noise was quite noticeable and higher than on the predecessor Galaxy S23. Like the Ultra, the standard S24 embeds a gain map in its image files that applies HDR rendering when photos are viewed on a compatible display. This feature was responsible for most of the still image quality improvements over the Galaxy S23.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Photo scores
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

114

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

Color

106

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Samsung Galaxy S24 – Pleasant skin tones and color rendering, very slight warm cast
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra – Pleasant skin tones and color rendering, very slight yellow cast

Autofocus

108

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Tripod
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 1000Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

Texture

104

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

81

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

73

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Bokeh

65

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

85

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Like the Galaxy S24 Ultra, the S24 uses its tele lens in bokeh mode, offering a better portrait focal length than wide-angle camera modules. Subject isolation from the background was good, and images had a nice blur gradient. However, our analysts noticed some segmentation instabilities and errors.

Samsung Galaxy S24 - Bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S24 - Segmentation artifacts
Samsung Galaxy S23 - Bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S23 - Entire subject in focus

In bokeh images, there was a noticeable difference between subjects and background in terms of noise. Given the S24’s fairly high noise levels, noise was quite noticeable on the subject, but blurred away on the background.

Samsung Galaxy S24 - Bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S24 - Slight segmentation artifacts
Samsung Galaxy S23 - Bokeh mode
Samsung Galaxy S23 - Good depth processing on the leaves in the background

Preview

69

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Our testers noticed a slight difference between the image capture and the preview on the screen, especially in terms of dynamic range, which was more limited in the preview.

Samsung Galaxy S24 – Preview at 100 Lux EV4
Samsung Galaxy S24 – Capture at 100 Lux EV4

Zoom

135

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 uses the same ultra-wide module as the flagship device S24 Ultra. Therefore images produced by the two cameras were very similar, with good texture, as well as accurate color and exposure. However, our testers observed some slight processing differences. The S24 Ultra managed to maintain high levels of detail even in the corners of the frame, while the S24 showed a significant loss of sharpness around the edges. When shooting with the tele, the S24 delivered an overall good performance at medium range, despite high levels of noise.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Zoom Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Wide

102

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

Ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy S24 – Good detail, except in the corners
Ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra – Excellent details at the center of the frame, good detail in the corners

Tele

99

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

Video

125

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Like the S24 Ultra, the S24 was tested in HDR video mode. Like on the flagship device, the S24 video clips offered good exposure, nice colors and even decent texture. The main difference between the two devices was video noise, which was stronger on the S24  than on the S24 Ultra and on the S23. Noise was noticeable even when recording in bright light. In addition, our testers noticed more autofocus issues than on the S23 and other S-series phones, with a consistent loss of focus in some test scenes.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Video scores
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

96

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

Color

99

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Autofocus

100

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

While the Galaxy S24 managed a good autofocus performance in most scenes, some strong focus issues were observed in the lab tests, where both the predecessor S23 and the S24 Ultra version did well. Our testers also noticed the same slightly slow reaction to changes in the scene that we had already seen on the Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S24 – Focus issues in low light

Samsung Galaxy S23 – Better focus on the target

Texture

104

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

91

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 showed higher noise levels than most competitors and even some other Samsung S-series devices. Noise was especially noticeable in low light, but fine luminance noise could also be spotted on most outdoor scenes, especially in blue skies.

Samsung Galaxy S24 – Spatial noise in the sky

Samsung Galaxy S23 – Very fine temporal noise
Samsung Galaxy S24 - frame extracted at 18s
luminance noise is visible in the sky
Samsung Galaxy S23 - frame extracted at 16s
low level of noise in the sky
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

112

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jellow artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

The Samsung S24 delivered well-stabilized video footage when recording in outdoor conditions. However, we observed some sharpness differences between video frames, especially in low light, where the difference to the flagship S24 Ultra was most noticeable.

Samsung Galaxy S24 – Good stabilization, slight sharpness differences between frames

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra – Good stabilization, moving texture artifacts

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Excellent stabilization

Artifacts

78

Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S24 CAMERA CAMERA 220_SamsungGalaxyS24_DxOMark__SamsungGalaxyS24_DxOMark_20240119 220_SamsungGalaxyS24Ultra_DxOMark__SamsungGalaxyS24Ultra_DxOMark_20240119 Screenshot_20240121_120336_Camera 20240121_120334 1230_SamsungGalaxyS24_DxOMark__SamsungGalaxyS24_DxOMark_20240119 1230_SamsungGalaxyS24Ultra_DxOMark__SamsungGalaxyS24Ultra_DxOMark_20240119
Honor Magic6 Pro Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-camera-test/#respond Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:00:06 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167335&preview=true&preview_id=167335 We put the Honor Magic6 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of [...]

The post Honor Magic6 Pro Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Honor Magic6 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1/1.28″ sensor, 24mm equivalent, automatic variable aperture f/1.4-f/2.0, AF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 50MP 1/2.88″ sensor, 13mm equivalent f/2.0-aperture lens, AF
  • Tele: 180MP 1/1.4″ sensor, 68mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens,  AF, OIS

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
158
camera
160
Photo
119

130

124

128

121

125

112

124

115

117

81

82

85
Bokeh
85

Best

83
Preview
83

91

160
Zoom
117

120

121

122

150
Video
114

116

119

Best

109

120

112

118

115

119

79

86

114

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Vivid and natural colors in both photo and video
  • Good detail at most zoom settings
  • Fast and accurate autofocus in photo
  • Nice portrait rendering with good subject segmentation in bokeh mode
  • Wide depth of field in scenes with subjects in multiple planes
  • Wide dynamic range and accurate face exposure in photo and video

Cons

  • Unnatural detail rendering in photo, zoom and video
  • Sharpness differences between video frames when walking while recording
  • Some artifacts when capturing high-contrast scenes
  • Motion blur on portraits in very low light

The Honor Magic6 Pro delivered an outstanding performance in the DXOMARK Camera tests, earning itself the top spot in our ranking, ahead of heavyweight devices, such as the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, Oppo Find X7 Ultra or Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max. It achieved excellent results across pretty much all test areas, without showing real weaknesses, and is also a noticeable improvement over its predecessor Magic5 Pro.

For photo, the Magic6 Pro achieved a joint top score with the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, thanks to nice colors as well as an excellent dynamic range and good face contrast, even in difficult backlit scenes. In addition, the autofocus system was a major plus point, operating accurately and quickly in all conditions. Honor followed some other manufacturers in installing a variable aperture on the Magic6 Pro, but the f/1.4-2.0 aperture range is not quite as wide as on the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ and Xiaomi 14 Ultra, which both offer a f/1.4-4.0 range. Still, as a result, the Honor provided a noticeably wider depth of field in group shots than devices without this feature, for example, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra (112). Image noise was well under control as well, but the Magic6 Pro still lagged slightly behind the best in terms of detail, mainly because of unnatural texture rendering on faces.

When zooming in or out from the primary camera, the Honor Magic6 Pro did an outstanding job, earning itself the best score to date for zoom. Performance was particularly good for the ultra-wide camera and video zoom. The 13mm equivalent ultra-wide matched the top-score of the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ in the wide category, with very good exposure and color. At the tele end of the zoom range, the Honor did not quite match the very best, but the 68mm equivalent tele module with its massive 180MP pixel count captured good detail, even at long range. Thanks to the occasional use of image fusion, results were good between 27mm and 68mm equivalent as well, but our testers noticed unnatural rendering of detail in some scenes.

Video results in the default HDR mode were very good, especially in terms of color rendering, which produced natural and pleasant color across all test conditions. However, the Honor still lagged slightly behind the class-leading video device iPhone 15 Pro Max, due to lower scores for exposure, stabilization and autofocus.

Color was a major plus point for the Honor when recording video. Color and white balance rendering were very natural and color transitions in changing light conditions were smooth and quick, which is particularly impressive when considering that the Magic6 Pro is the first Honor device with an HDR video mode. Exposure was good and a wide dynamic range ensured good detail in the highlight and shadow portions of the frame. However, unlike on the iPhone 15 Pro Max, our testers also noticed some exposure instabilities. The trade-off between video texture and noise reduction was decent, but the Honor could not quite reach the same high levels as the iPhone, and especially the Oppo Find X7 Ultra for this attribute. Our testers were impressed by the Honor’s video stabilization in good light, but noticed some sharpness differences between video frames when recording in low light. The video autofocus worked well but some slight instabilities had a negative impact on the overall experience.

Please note that the Magic6 Pro’s camera is equipped with Honor’s new AI Motion Sensing system, which is designed to capture the most interesting moment in scenes with motion and specifically sports. However, this system is not activated by default and was therefore not within the scope of this test.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Vibrant colors and accurate skin tone
BEST 154
Friends & Family

The Magic6 Pro is an excellent device for taking pictures and recording videos of friends and family. Focus is a key criteria for this use case, and the Honor did very well for this attribute, with a wide depth of field ensuring focus on all subjects in group shots, as well as an accurate and very fast autofocus allowing the capture of the decisive moment in moving scenes. In addition, pleasant colors and good exposure helped render subjects in the best possible way. On the downside, our testers noticed unnatural rendering of detail and motion blur in some low-light scenes.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Wide dynamic range, nice color and skin tones
BEST 138
Lowlight

The Honor Magic6 Pro provided excellent noise management, which is a key factor in low-light shooting. In addition, the camera captured images with a wide dynamic range, accurate target exposure and nice color rendering in most conditions, including low-light scenes. On the downside, subject detail could be low, or look unnatural in low light. Our testers also noticed some HDR rendering instabilities in very dim light.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Wide, dynamic range, nice color rendering, good detail

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Honor Magic6 Pro Camera Scores
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

160

Honor Magic6 Pro

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The Honor Magic6 equals the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ for the top score in the photo category, thanks to very good exposure and color as well as an excellent autofocus performance. Texture was the only test area where the Honor disappointed slightly, due to occasional unnatural texture rendering on faces.

Honor Magic6 Pro Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

Exposure was very good, with excellent face exposure in all light conditions and a very wide dynamic range. The Honor was capable of recovering highlight detail, even in strongly backlit scenes, surpassing most of the competition in this respect. The device did generally very well in high-contrast scenes and was capable of producing excellent contrast, surpassing the best in class in some scenes. On the downside, our testers noticed some exposure instabilities, which on very rare occasions, could be very strong and result in clipped highlights.

Honor Magic6 Pro - Backlighting
Honor Magic6 Pro - Good face exposure, slightly low contrast
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Backlighting
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Slightly underexposed face

Color

124

Honor Magic6 Pro

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

In our tests, the Magic6 Pro produced very natural and pleasant white balance and was one of the very best devices in this area. Only in a small number of low-light scenes did our testers notice a pink cast. Color rendering was nice and vivid, with slightly stronger saturation than the real-life scenes. Skin tones were nice, even in backlit scenes, where some of the Honor’s rivals struggle.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Accurate skin tones
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Slightly green skin tones
Google Pixel 8 Pro – Slightly pink skin tones

Autofocus

121

Honor Magic6 Pro

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.

The Honor’s autofocus system worked pretty much flawlessly, capturing sharp subjects in all conditions. It was also extremely fast, allowing for easy capture of the right moment in moving scenes.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

When multiple subjects are detected in a scene the variable aperture switches to f/2 for a wider depth of field, ensuring good sharpness and detail at different subject distances.

Honor Magic6 Pro - Depth of field
Honor Magic6 Pro - Wide depth of field, background subject in focus
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Depth of field
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Narrow depth of field, background subject out of focus

Texture

112

Honor Magic6 Pro

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

In our texture tests, the camera captured high levels of detail, especially when shooting in daylight. However, it did not quite match the very best in class, such as the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max or the Oppo Find X7 Ultra. The main point of criticism is the Honor’s unnatural rendering of detail in faces.

Honor Magic6 Pro - Detail
Honor Magic6 Pro - Uneven levels of detail on face
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

115

Honor Magic6 Pro

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Like previous Honor flagship devices, the Magic6 Pro did very well at managing image noise, achieving outstanding results in this category. Some slight noise was noticeable when shooting in low light, but in brighter conditions, images were mostly noise-free.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

81

Honor Magic6 Pro

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties
Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro - Visible fusion artifact

 

Only very few artifacts were noticeable in our Magic6 Pro sample shots. However, in high-contrast scenes, the extensive use of HDR fusion algorithms could lead to ghosting and other fusion artifacts.

Bokeh

85

Honor Magic6 Pro

Best

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

When shooting in portrait mode, depth estimation and subject isolation for creating the simulated bokeh effect were very accurate, leaving hardly any artifacts around the foreground subject. In addition, skin tones were a major strength and very natural. The camera was also quite consistent at applying the effect. Unlike previous Honor models, the Magic6 Pro did not display any focus inconsistencies in bokeh mode, making for a nice improvement.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Natural skin tones
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Pink skin tones

Preview

83

Honor Magic6 Pro

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

The Magic6 Pro provided a very good preview of the final capture in the camera app, always showing similar face exposure between capture and preview. But when it comes to preview in general, the latest iPhone generation is still very slightly ahead, thanks to better user experience when it comes to zoom. For example, the Honor Magic6 Pro displayed some jumps in the field of view when zooming.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Capture
Honor Magic6 Pro – Preview: similar face exposure, slightly less dynamic

Zoom

160

Honor Magic6 Pro

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Magic6 Pro achieved the top score for zoom to date, thanks to very good consistency across pretty much the entire zoom range and excellent repeatability. The quality of the ultra-wide camera stood out especially, delivering the best results of all tested smartphones to date.

The Honor comes with a very large 1/1.4″ image sensor in the tele camera, which contributed to the overall very good tele zoom quality. At closer tele zoom settings (less than 68mm equivalent), the camera sometimes fuses image information from the main and tele camera, which resulted in very good detail at the center of the frame. Image quality was also very good at the tele module’s native 68mm equivalent focal length. However, quality dropped somewhat at long range (> 150mm) where the Honor sometimes rendered detail unnaturally on faces, and some rivals, for example, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, managed to provide slightly better quality images. Our testers also found some unnatural detail rendering on faces at long range.

Honor Magic6 Pro Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Wide

121

Honor Magic6 Pro

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

The Honor Magic6 Pro ultra-wide camera comes with a 13mm equivalent (12.8mm measured) focal length, which is one of the widest we have seen. Images showed very high levels of detail, generally accurate target exposure, and dynamic range that was on par with the rivals in its class. Color rendering was mostly accurate as well, but in some scenes, red and blue tones could be slightly too accentuated.

Honor Magic6 Pro - Ultra-wide
Honor Magic6 Pro - Good detail, high saturation
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Ultra-wide
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Slightly less details and lower saturation

Tele

117

Honor Magic6 Pro

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

In terms of tele zooming, the Honor did well but could not quite match the best-in-class Oppo Find X7 Ultra, Vivo X100 Pro and Huawei P60 Pro. The levels of captured detail were very high at close and medium tele ranges, even in low light. At tele settings between the primary camera and the tele module, the application of image fusion resulted in additional detail at the center of the frame, when compared to the edges. Tele images showed a wide dynamic range, consistently accurate exposure and generally acceptable color rendering. Thanks to the high 180MP pixel count of the tele module, the Honor managed to preserve fine detail  well when zooming digitally in daylight conditions.

Honor Magic6 Pro - Tele (~45mm equivalent)
Honor Magic6 Pro - Good detail at the center of the frame
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Tele (~45mm equivalent)
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Lack of detail at the center of the frame
Google Pixel 8 Pro - Tele (~45mm equivalent)
Google Pixel 8 Pro - Lack of detail at the center of the frame
Honor Magic6 Pro - Tele (~68mm equivalent)
Honor Magic6 Pro - Good detail
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Tele (~68mm equivalent)
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Lack of detail

The Magic6 Pro’s 68mm long tele range showed some image detail limitations over the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, which has a long tele range of 90mm.

Honor Magic6 Pro (~135mm equivalent)
Slightly lower texture/noise tradeoff
Huawei Mate 60 Pro + (~135mm equivalent)
Slightly higher texture/noise tradeoff
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (~135mm equivalent)
Slightly higher texture/noise tradeoff
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

Video

150

Honor Magic6 Pro

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In video mode, the Honor Magic6 Pro is noticeably improved over its predecessor Magic5 Pro, but the Magic6 Pro could not quite match the best-in-class Apple iPhone 15 Pro and Oppo Find X7 Ultra. The Honor provided an overall very good video experience, with good color and color transitions. In addition, exposure was accurate and stable in most test conditions.

Video stabilization effectively counteracted even strong camera motion, for example, when running while recording, but sharpness differences between video frames were noticeable in low-light clips. Video noise was well under control most of the time, but slight noise was often visible on moving subjects, especially in low-light recordings.

Compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, the Honor Magic6 Pro scored slightly lower, mainly because of some occasional loss of local detail and autofocus instabilities, as well as sharpness differences between frames in low light.

Please note that, unlike the Magic5 Pro, the new device records HDR format video at default settings. A compatible display is required to view the Magic6 Pro’s video output in this proprietary format. 

Honor Magic6 Pro Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

114

Honor Magic6 Pro

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

Magic6 Pro video clips showed good dynamic range, which was on par with the iPhone 15 Pro Max and other top-end devices. In addition, contrast was good, and faces were well-exposed. Compared to the iPhone, the Honor showed slightly more exposure instabilities in indoor conditions.

Color

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Best

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Video color rendering was pleasant, with generally accurate skin tones and quite saturated colors, which is typical for Honor phones. Color adaptations were nice and smooth.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Accurate exposure, good contrast, pleasant color rendering, excellent stabilization of walking motion, flare

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate exposure, good contrast, pleasant color rendering, excellent stabilization of walking motion

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Accurate exposure, accurate color rendering, walking motion well compensated

Autofocus

109

Honor Magic6 Pro

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Honor Magic6 Pro – Slight focus instabilities

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Stable focus

Texture

112

Honor Magic6 Pro

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of detail in the bright areas as well as in the dark ones. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

The Honor Magic6 Pro delivered a good trade-off between texture preservation and noise reduction in video mode but lagged slightly behind the Oppo Find X7 Ultra.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Noise

115

Honor Magic6 Pro

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

114

Honor Magic6 Pro

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jellow artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Video stabilization was very effective for both walking and running motion, with performance mostly on par with the best-in-class Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max. Sharpness differences between frames were, however, slightly visible in low-light conditions, which resulted in a slightly lower score than the Apple in this category.

Honor Magic6 Pro – Slight sharpness differences between frames

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Consistent sharpness

Artifacts

79

Honor Magic6 Pro

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Honor Magic6 Pro Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-camera-test/feed/ 0 Honor Magic6 Pro Best Best CAMERA CAMERA HonorMagic6Pro_cover HonorMagic6Pro_FriendsFamily HonorMagic6Pro_Lowlight HonorMagic6Pro_color_ HuaweiMate60ProPlus GooglePixel8Pro_color Best HonorMagic6Pro_Bokeh HuaweiMate60ProPlus_bokeh HonorMagic6Pro_preview1 HonorMagic6Pro_preview2 Best
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a55-5g-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a55-5g-camera-test/#respond Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:34:46 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167690&preview=true&preview_id=167690 We put the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP sensor, f/1.8-aperture lens, AF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP sensor, 123-degree field of view, f/2.2-aperture lens
  • Macro: 5MP sensor, f/2.4-aperture lens

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
108
camera
110
Photo
98

130

92

128

90

125

93

124

71

117

67

82

45
Bokeh
45

85

54
Preview
54

91

75
Zoom
43

120

93

122

117
Video
95

116

92

119

80

120

83

118

100

119

79

86

103

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Accurate exposure, fairly wide dynamic range in bright light and indoors
  • Fairly high texture levels in bright light
  • Fairly good video stabilization when standing still while recording

Cons

  • Some autofocus and exposure instabilities and stepping
  • Noise, particularly in the shadow areas of the frame
  • Occasionally inaccurate color rendering
  • Ineffective video stabilization when moving while recording
  • Hues shifts, flare and fusion artifacts
  • Limited zoom capabilities, low texture and limited dynamic range in zoom shots

The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is one of the latest model in Samsung’s A series and the successor to the A54 5G, which we tested previously.  The new model shares some camera hardware specifications with its predecessor, and in our tests, camera performance was on a similar level as well. Overall results were pretty average for this class of device, with accurate exposure and fairly good texture when shooting in decent light conditions.

However, in more challenging situations, for example strongly backlit scenes, very low light or scenes with motion, our testers observed a range of failures, including hue shifts around clipped areas, ghosting effects and a noticeable decline of the autofocus tracking capabilities. Surprisingly, our testers found the A55’s bokeh mode to be less accurate, with more subject segmentation errors and activation failures, than on the predecessor.

The lack of a dedicated tele camera module meant that tele zoom image quality was quite limited. In terms of ultra-wide, the A55 offered a slightly wider dynamic range than the A54 but exposed higher noise levels, especially in the shadow areas of the frame. In addition, color rendering was less pleasant, with some color spread. In video mode, stabilization was not quite on the same level as the best-in-class devices, for example, the Apple iPhone 15 Pro.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Camera Scores vs High-End
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

110

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Photo scores vs High-End
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.
Samsung Galaxy A55 – Fairly wide dynamic range but slight underexposure, low texture and noise, especially in the shadows
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ4EV Daylight Tripod
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 1000Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 4, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 4. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Zoom

75

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Video

117

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Video scores vs High-End
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Samsung Galaxy A55 – Exposure instabilities (background and when model turns), noise (particularly in the shadows), autofocus stepping when approaching the model, fairly effective stabilization when standing still, but frame shifts during panning
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

The post Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-a55-5g-camera-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy A55 5G CAMERA CAMERA Lightbulb_SamsungGalaxyA555G_DxOMark
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Camera test https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x7-ultra-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x7-ultra-camera-test/#respond Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:01:36 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=168145&preview=true&preview_id=168145 We put the Oppo Find X7 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results [...]

The post Oppo Find X7 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Oppo Find X7 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1″ sensor, 23mm equivalent f/1.8-aperture lens, AF, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 50MP 1/1.95″ sensor, 14mm equivalent f/2-aperture lens, AF
  • Tele 1: 50MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 65mm equivalent f/2.6-aperture lens, AF, OIS
  • Tele 2: 50MP 1/2.51″ sensor, 135mm equivalent f/4.3-aperture lens, AF, OIS

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
157
camera
156
Photo
118

130

124

128

112

125

118

124

111

117

76

82

85
Bokeh
85

Best

79
Preview
79

91

156
Zoom
118

120

109

122

156
Video
113

116

117

119

115

120

116

118

119

Best

84

86

117

118

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 180

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 169

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 138

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 154

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Pros

  • Good color rendering and white balance in photo and video
  • Excellent bokeh effect with good subject isolation and high levels of detail
  • Very good detail at medium and long-range tele
  • Good texture/noise trade-off in photo and video, even in low light
  • Accurate exposure and wide dynamic range on portraits and landscape shots

Cons

  • Slight loss of detail at close range tele and in ultra-wide shots
  • Exposure and tone mapping instabilities in video, especially in high-contrast indoor scenes
  • Occasional unnatural texture rendering
  • Occasional slight overexposure in low-light photos

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra delivered outstanding results in the DXOMARK Camera tests and deservedly shares the top spot in the ranking with the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+. Scores were excellent across all test areas but the Oppo especially stood out in terms of portrait capture, thanks to natural and accurate colors and high levels of detail in all shooting conditions.

The latest Oppo flagship features an impressive list of hardware specifications, including high-resolution 50MP image sensor in all four camera modules. The main camera comes with a very large 1″ variant that is capable of collecting a lot of photons and therefore image information. In practice, this resulted in natural-looking images with high levels of detail and low noise across all test conditions. On the tele zoom side of things, the FindX 7 Ultra offers two periscope cameras, which provide very high levels of detail when zooming in from 3x to 6x and beyond, across all light conditions. Bokeh images in portrait mode showed accurate subject isolation, as well as excellent color rendering and high levels of detail, thanks to the use of the 3x tele module in this mode.

Unlike some other flagship devices, the FindX7 Ultra does not use an HDR format in video but still relies on the SDR-8-bit format. However, video output was still excellent, with accurate subject exposure and a wide dynamic range. Video clips featured vivid colors and natural skin tones, as well as a very good trade-off between detail preservation and noise reduction, even when recording in low light.

Please note that our test sample photos were captured at default settings in a proprietary HDR format and displayed on the device’s display using ProXDR technology. Currently, Oppo’s proprietary system is not widely compatible with other Android devices, but Oppo has announced that it will in the future be compatible with Google’s Ultra HDR standard. As DXOMARK does not have access to the visualization tools that are required for the assessment of this proprietary HDR format, our evaluation was undertaken using an SDR visualization workflow. It should be noted though that ProXDR captures provided a more pleasant contrast in dim conditions than the SDR counterparts. 

BEST 154
Friends & Family

Our testers found the Oppo Find X7 Ultra to be an excellent device for taking photos and videos of friends and family. The camera captured vivid colors, rendered skin tones naturally, and created a pleasant bokeh effect. In addition, it did a great job at freezing motion in scenes with moving subjects, allowing for easy capture of the decisive moment.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Great detail in portraits, good subject isolation, pleasant skin tones, nice bokeh effect
BEST 138
Lowlight

The latest Oppo flagship is one of the best smartphones for shooting in dim conditions, similar to its predecessor Oppo Find X6 Pro. In our tests, it did a great job at revealing shadow detail with nice contrast, and low-light images showed good detail and very low noise. This is true for photo as well as video, where the Oppo matched the very low noise levels of the iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Extended dynamic range, good detail recovery with low level of noise

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us  on how to receive a full report.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra Camera Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

156

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

169

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our still image tests, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra delivered great results across all key image quality attributes. Our testers particularly liked the well-balanced color rendering with natural skin tones in all conditions. Exposure was generally pleasant, and a fairly wide dynamic range ensured good detail in both the highlight and shadow areas of the frame. The high levels of captured texture and low noise allowed for the capture of high-quality portrait and landscape images alike. In addition, the well tuned auto-exposure and zero-shutter lag, coupled with the main camera’s large image sensor allowed for freezing motion and capturing the decisive moment.

Unlike some of its rivals, the Oppo does not feature a variable aperture, resulting in a slightly more shallow depth of field. Therefore background subjects in group shots were not rendered perfectly in focus in our tests. Our testers also noticed some contrast and skin tone issues in high-contrast scenes, but despite these minor flaws, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra delivered still images with overall high quality and natural rendering.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra Photo scores vs Ultra-Premium
The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.
Close-Up

Close-up is the third use case score introduced with DXOMARK Camera version 5. It evaluates the camera’s ability to capture detail at subject distances below 10cm and magnifications as close as possible to 1:1.

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra automatically switches to the ultra-wide camera module in macro mode. In our tests, the minimum shooting distance in macro mode was slightly longer than on most direct competitors, but image quality in macro mode remained acceptable.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Good color rendering but a slightly lower level of detail than competitors
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slight yellow cast, high levels of detail
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – High levels of detail, good subject isolation

Exposure

118

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

130

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Exposure is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.

In our tests, the Oppo captured still images with good exposure and a fairly wide dynamic range. In dim conditions, exposure was sometimes slightly too bright, which resulted in good detail but took away some of the low-light mood. Images showed good detail in both highlight and shadow areas of the frame, but our testers noticed a slight lack of contrast in difficult backlit scenes.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Good target exposure and wide dynamic range
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good target exposure and slight highlight clipping
Huawei P60 Pro – Good target exposure and wide dynamic range
Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Slightly low contrast on faces in backlit conditions
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slightly low contrast on faces in backlit conditions
Huawei P60 Pro – Slightly low contrast on faces in backlit conditions

Color

124

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

128

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Color is one of the key attributes for technically good pictures. The image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Colors were natural, vivid, and accurate, with only very slightly visible and well-controlled white balance casts. In addition, all types of skin tones were rendered nicely and naturally across all light conditions. On some occasions, our testers noticed slightly oversaturated colors that were affected by contrast issues.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Very slight cast and fairly accurate skin tone rendering
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Visible orange cast affecting skin tone rendering
Huawei P60 Pro – Slight cast and fairly accurate skin tone rendering

Autofocus

112

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

125

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

The Oppo´s autofocus was fast, accurate, and reliable. Instant captures with zero-shutter lag were achieved in most conditions, but not always in high-contrast scenes. The large sensor in the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s main camera module provides a fairly shallow depth of field. As a result, some subject isolation was achieved in portrait shots, but in group shots, background subjects were not rendered perfectly sharp. Unlike some rivals, such as the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra does not feature a variable aperture, but it still managed to maintain some detail on background subjects using software processing.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 100Lux Δ4EV TL84 Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 100Lux with TL84 illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 4, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 4. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Some sharpness retrieved on faces in middle plane, sometimes at the expense of a unnatural rendering
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Some loss of detail on faces in middle plane
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Good details in the middle plane

Texture

118

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

124

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Thanks to the large sensor’s light-collection capabilities, the camera generally captured high levels of detail and managed good preservation of fine detail. In general, details were better preserved than on most competitors, except the iPhone 15 Pro Max which, in bright conditions, delivers 24MP images with significantly better details.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Fine details well preserved
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Very fine details well preserved thanks to the larger 24MP output
Huawei P60 Pro
Huawei P60 Pro - Fine details well preserved

Noise

111

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

117

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Noise levels were well under control, but measured slightly higher than on the predecessor Find X6 Pro in the lab. Still, noise remained barely noticeable, even in low light, thanks to the large image sensor in the main camera module and effective image processing.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Very low noise
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Slight luminance noise
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Very low noise

Artifacts

76

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

82

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Image artifacts were very well under control on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra. Only some ghosting could be slightly visible in some scenes with motion. Occasionally, some image processing inaccuracies in challenging scenes could lead to artifacts in the rendering of the face.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Occasional unnatural face rendering in challenging scenes with motion

Bokeh

85

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Best

Bokeh is tested in one dedicated mode, usually portrait or aperture mode, and analyzed by visually inspecting all the images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce portrait photography comparable to one taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur spotlights. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Portrait mode is one of the Oppo’s strong points. Like the direct competitors in the ultra-premium segment, the Find X7 Ultra produced good depth estimation and an accurate blur gradient, even around fine detail. However, the use of the 3x tele camera in portrait mode is a major advantage over the competition as it provides an angle of view that is more suited to portraiture, while also delivering good detail and accurate skin tones.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Accurate subject isolation with good detail preservation
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Slight inaccuracies on fine subject segmentation
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+
Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ - Slight inaccuracies on fine subject segmentation

Preview

79

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

91

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

In our tests, the preview image on the display was pretty close to the final capture, but like on most competitors, dynamic range was more limited in preview, and the bokeh effect was less accurate and pronounced than in the final image.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Capture
Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Preview – Slight difference in bokeh effect with final capture

Zoom

156

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

164

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Zoom is a key strength of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra camera. Compared to the predecessor, the new model comes with better tele hardware, now offering two tele camera modules with a large sensor. As a result, high levels of detail were captured at tele zoom settings between 3x and 6x and beyond. In addition, noise levels were low, and images showed good exposure and color accuracy. However, the Oppo does not apply any image fusion at close range tele (1x to 3x). In our tests, this resulted in lower levels of detail, compared to the direct competitors that use image fusion, at close-range zoom levels.

At a 14mm equivalent focal length, the ultra-wide camera offers a slightly wider field of view than the Find X6 Pro. However, the module uses a smaller image sensor, and in our tests, the level of captured detail was not quite on par with rivals such as the Huawei P60 Pro or the Vivo X100 Pro. Still, overall the Oppo Find X7 Ultra managed fairly high image quality across a wide range of zoom settings, peaking at medium and long-range tele.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.
Video Zoom

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra delivered high levels of fine detail as well as low noise when zooming in video mode. Despite the addition of camera modules, transitions are still well handled with little change in framing, and changes are only slightly visible in terms of exposure and color. But smoother transitions on the market are still achieved by the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Wide

109

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

122

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

The new Oppo flagship’s ultra-wide camera comes with a wider focal range and slightly smaller image sensor than the equivalent module of its predecessor, which results in a wider field of view. Still, distortion and anamorphosis artifacts were handled well and only noticeable in some shots. Compared to its most direct competitors, the Find X7 Ultra’s ultra-wide camera captured slightly lower levels of detail. Image noise was well under control.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Slight loss of details
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Good detail preservation
Huawei P60 Pro
Huawei P60 Pro - Good detail preservation

Tele

118

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

120

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

When using the tele zoom, the Oppo captured excellent levels of detail with its 3x dedicated tele camera. The same was true for the 6x long tele module. In addition, the level of captured detail was consistently high at intermediary zoom levels between the two tele modules. However, unlike its predecessor, the Find X7 Ultra does not apply any image fusion between 1x and 3x tele zoom, resulting in lower levels of detail.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Fine detail preservation with a low level of noise in medium range
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Slight loss of fine details in medium range
Huawei P60 Pro
Huawei P60 Pro - Slight loss of fine details in medium range
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Good detail preservation at long range
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Good detail preservation at long range
Huawei P60 Pro
Huawei P60 Pro - Good detail preservation at long range with slight loss of fine details

Video

156

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

158

Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our tests, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s performance in video mode was excellent. Like for stills, color rendering was very good, with a nicely controlled white balance cast and pleasant skin tones. The camera recorded high levels of detail while managing to keep noise down, even in low light. Unlike some rivals, for example, the latest generation iPhones, the Oppo does not record in HDR format. Still, even in SDR format, video clips offered accurate exposure as well as a fairly wide dynamic range with good contrast. In addition, the video autofocus was fast and accurate, and the stabilization system did a good job at keeping things smooth and stable in all light conditions.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra Video scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

113

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

116

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.

Video exposure was accurate and recorded footage offered a wide dynamic range. However, our testers also noticed some slight instabilities and abrupt exposure transitions.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Extended dynamic range and good face exposure

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Extended dynamic range and good face exposure

Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ – Extended dynamic range and good face exposure

Color

117

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

119

Honor Magic6 Pro

Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Color rendering in video was fairly natural and accurate, offering pleasant skin-tone rendering, even in warm low light, which often can have a negative effect on skin tones. As for exposure, transitions in changing light conditions could have been smoother for a more natural effect.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Accurate skin tone rendering on both model with only a very slight cast

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Slightly visible cast affecting skin tone rendering of both models

Huawei P60 Pro – Slightly visible cast affecting skin tone rendering of both models

Autofocus

115

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

120

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Video autofocus was fast and accurate while maintaining good subject tracking. In addition, focus transitions were fairly smooth and lacked distracting stepping effects.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Good tracking of the subject

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good tracking of the subject

Huawei P60 Pro – Good tracking of the subject

Texture

116

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

118

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

As for still images, the level of captured detail in video mode was very high. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra especially stood out in indoor and low-light recording where it managed to maintain high levels of detail. In some challenging low-light conditions, motion in the scene could induce scene integrity artifacts and a loss of texture, but overall, the Oppo’s video clips offered good detail with natural rendering.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Good detail preservation with low level of noise

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good detail preservation with low level of noise

Huawei P60 Pro – Good detail preservation with slight noise

Noise

119

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Best

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Video noise was managed extremely well on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra across all light conditions. Noise was barely noticeable in most areas of the frame and could only become slightly visible around moving elements in the scene.

Stabilization

117

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

118

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jello artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Video stabilization was effective at counteracting camera shake. Only sometimes was a loss of sharpness noticeable in a few frames of video clips recorded while walking.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra – Effective video stabilization, with slight loss of sharpness between frames

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Effective video stabilization

Huawei P60 Pro – Effective video stabilization, with slight loss of sharpness between frames

Artifacts

84

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

86

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

Unwanted image artifacts were well under control in video mode. Only very few artifacts, including some occasional aliasing, were noticeable.

The post Oppo Find X7 Ultra Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x7-ultra-camera-test/feed/ 0 Oppo Find X7 Ultra Best Best CAMERA CAMERA 106 (1)_OppoFindX7Ultra BarNeonOFF_OppoFindX7Ultra_05-00 201 (1)_OppoFindX7Ultra 201 (1)_AppleiPhone15ProMax 201 (1)_HuaweiMate60ProPlus BridgeHDR_OppoFindX7Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 BridgeHDR_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 BridgeHDR_HuaweiP60Pro_DxOMark_05-00 DuoBacklit_OppoFindX7Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 DuoBacklit_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 DuoBacklit_HuaweiP60Pro_DxOMark_05-00 CandleDinner_OppoFindX7Ultra_DxOMark_05-00 CandleDinner_AppleiPhone15ProMax_DxOMark_05-00 CandleDinner_HuaweiP60Pro_DxOMark_05-00 Best HelloStill_OppoFindX7Ultra_05-00 HelloStillPreview_OppoFindX7Ultra_01-00 Best